Gentrification around the 606: pressure continues in Logan Square and Humboldt Park

By Clarissa Corral and Félix Lafortune

The 606 trail, connecting the two neighborhoods of Humboldt Park and Logan Square.
Credit: Wikimedia Commons

Reflecting on her move from Humboldt Park to Berwyn in 2019, Patricia Prado remembers the bittersweet feeling of having to say goodbye to the neighborhood she lived in for 22 years.

“I miss everything being so close to me,” Prado said. “I miss my neighbors, I miss being able to walk to my favorite store.”

Prado said her relocation was on account of her family outgrowing their home, along with the increase in property taxes due to the ongoing gentrification in the Humboldt Park neighborhood. She lived a short walk away from the 606 Bloomingdale Trail.

“I didn’t have the financial means to do what I needed to do and so because the area was so hot and gentrification was still going on, people want the land,” Prado said. “They didn’t care about my house. It’s all about location.”

According to a 2020 study conducted by DePaul University, prices for one- to four-unit buildings near the 606 Bloomingdale Trail have more than quadrupled — a nearly 344 percent increase since 2012. The 2.7 mile-long trail and park system opened in 2015 and connects four Chicago neighborhoods: Wicker Park, Bucktown, Humboldt Park and Logan Square.

In an effort to address the pressure of gentrification surrounding the trail, the city council approved a six-month ordinance freeze that began on Feb.1. The ordinance freeze has banned demolition permits along the western portion of the trail, according to an article by The Daily Line.

GOOGLE MAP: Outline of Logan Square and Humboldt Park, connected by the 606.

Mayor Lori Lightfoot rejected the initial ordinance proposal, which called for new construction permits and zoning changes near the trail, in addition to a 12- to 14-month pause for demolitions, according to an article by Curbed Chicago.

John Betancur, an Urban Planning professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) who has conducted research on gentrification in Chicago neighborhoods, said the ordinance is very “cosmetic” and will not end the ongoing gentrification in the surrounding neighborhoods.

“Cities can stop gentrification if they want, but they don’t want to because cities live off property taxes, and gentrification increases the property taxes, so they love gentrification,” Betancur said.

Daniel Jacinto Buie, a UIC undergraduate student who has lived in Humboldt Park his entire life, said the 606 trail has had a positive impact on his community.

“It’s brought a lot of opportunities for us to embrace the park, it makes it more beautiful and attracts more people into our community to come in and just tour our culture,” Jacinto Buie said.

In contrast, Betancur said the 606 is one of the many contributions of the city to enhance gentrification in the Humboldt Park and Logan Square neighborhoods.

“The 606 is part of the city’s intervention to advance gentrification, the point is gentrification also needs help from the government, particularly it needs help in infrastructure, it needs help in rescuing spaces,” Betancur said. “So you wouldn’t say it produced gentrification, you would say it added to the momentum of gentrification.”

Once a largely Hispanic neighborhood, Logan Square lost nearly 20 percent of its Hispanic population from 2000 to 2017, according to data from Community Data Snapshot. The white population, on the other hand, experienced an increase of about 20 percent from 2000 to 2017.

ADOBE SPARK VIDEO: A brief history of Logan Square and Humboldt Park.

Richard Salinas, a UIC undergraduate student who resides in Logan Square and lived walking distance from the 606 trail had to move because his family could no longer afford the rent of their apartment. 

“They [property owners] were getting more people to move in that were willing to pay those prices, whereas we’re a family of four and a one room apartment for that much that the owner wanted to charge us for; so we just ended up moving farther away,” Salinas said. 

In addition to increase in rent and housing prices, Salinas said the 606 trail brought significant change to the Logan Square neighborhood where he has lived in all his life.

“There used to be a lot more family owned businesses, now there are a lot of bars, literally every block is a bar,” Salinas said. 

According to Betancur, the flipping and demolition of homes has aided the gentrification in the Logan Square and Humboldt Park neighborhoods, which has led to an increase in property values.

“People saw how much money can be made by turning a low income neighborhood into a middle income neighborhood and that became an industry,” Betancur said. “So today, gentrification is an industry.” 

According to Zillow, an online marketplace for rentals and real estate, the median home value for the Logan Square neighborhoods has increased 45.8% in seven years, from $273,000 in Aug. 2012 to 398,000 in Aug. 2019.

Rent is also slightly higher than the median rent is in Chicago. The median rent price in Logan Square is $1,800, compared to $1,761 for the rest of the city. The website has predicted that this tendency is likely to continue, forecasting an increase of 4.1% in home value over the next year.

STORYMAP: A range of property listings in Logan Square.

Despite the consequences that gentrification has brought on these neighborhoods, both Salinas and Jacinto Buie said it has brought new and attractive opportunities.

“There’s more opportunities coming for our neighborhood, different shops coming up here and there, different types of companies appearing in our neighborhood,” Jacinto Buie said. “It makes our neighborhood look nice and makes us feel good; we can walk around without any trouble.”

In addition to having new opportunities and new businesses, Salinas said that his neighborhood has an increased feeling of safety. He attributed it to gentrification.

“Since gentrification started, it got safer to walk around than when I was younger because I know my parents wouldn’t let me go out much because it was bad,” Salinas said, “and ever since more people started getting pushed out, it’s gotten safer.”

An overlooking view of Wicker Park from the 606 trail. 
Credit: Wikimedia Commons

Safety is often regarded as one of the upsides of gentrification, but when asked about the pros and cons of gentrification, Betancur said he had a different way of looking at the issue. 

“I look at it in terms of who are the winners and who are the losers, and basically you have the cities as winners because they get more money [and] property taxes,” Betancur said. “So taxpayers that don’t get their share are losers, definitely people that are displaced from their neighborhoods are losers, because they have their lives there, their neighbors, their networks, their support organizations.”

This is the experience that a number of residents have been the victim of. Jacinto Buie said that he would be devastated if he had to move from his neighborhood because of increase in prices as a result of gentrification. 

“I would be broken because I grew up here, I took my first steps here,” Jacinto Buie said. “I would be super numb to the fact that I’d have to move and I’m getting kicked out because property values would be raised. This is my home— I’ve never called anywhere else home— it would be life changing.”

Sanders Eclipses Warren, Kobe Bryant the Grammys

Bernie Sanders Overshadows Elizabeth Warren Admits Comments

Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders continues to dominate in searches over his rival from Massachusetts, Elizabeth Warren, admits the controversial comments he has made in a discussion back in 2018.

The two candidates met to discuss how to best defeat current president Donald J. Trump. When Senator Warren explained that she could convince voters that she could create a strong economy, and that she would be able to go get those female voters, Senator Sanders replied saying that he did not believe that a woman could win the presidency over Trump.

This argument came to the light of day in early January, which resulted in a spike in both of their Google searches. According to an analysis of Google search on Google Trends, we can see that Bernie Sanders remains is searched more frequently than Elizabeth Warren.

The last time Warren was searched at a higher rate than Sanders was after the Democratic Debate of December 19th, 2019. Other than that event, Bernie Sanders has consistently remained a more popular search subject on Google.

With the Iowa caucus coming up on Monday, February 3, 2020, it will be interesting to see if senator Sander’s popularity will be reflected in the result of the event.

The United States mourn Kobe Bryant, snub Grammy Awards

In the light of the recent news about Kobe and Gianna Bryant’s deaths, searches of his name have surged on Google, at the expense of the 62nd Grammy Awards ceremony.

The late NBA icon, his daughter, and 7 other passengers died in the helicopter crash that occurred in Calabasas, California on January 26th. Details about the circumstances of the accident have yet to be confirmed.

That same night, the Recording Academy hosted the annual Grammy Awards at the Staples Center in downtown Los Angeles, close the location of the crash. The event, hosted by artist Alicia Keys was at a 12-year low in terms of viewership. 18.7 million people watched the ceremony aired on CBS.

An analysis of a Google Trends data shows that Kobe Bryant had been searched more frequently in the past 7 days that what would be considered the most important night of the year for the music industry.

Many things could have been the reason for the low viewership of this year’s Grammy Awards. The Recording Academy is in the midst of a sexual harassment scandal in which former CEO Deborah Dugan was put on administrative leave by the board of trustees for alleged bullying.

Whatever the reason for the low popularity of the Award show’s searched on that day, America will be mourning the passing of one of its greatest athletes of all time.

Quinn: Pensions Threatening MAP Grant Program

Gov. Pat Quinn talks about MAP grants at DePaul University. (Photo/Bob Smith)

By Bob Smith

Gov. Pat Quinn visited DePaul University’s Loop campus on Wednesday to discuss how pension reform is harming the Monetary Award Program (MAP) college scholarships and access to higher education in Illinois.

“This is so important to our state, not only in the past, but certainly now and in the future,” Quinn said.

“We want everyone to have the opportunity to go to college that has the ability to go to college.”

MAP grants are need-based college scholarships that allow merit students who are in need across the state and do not need to be repaid by the student. Quinn said that due to cutbacks and having to pay more money in the pension amount, almost 18,000 students lost their MAP grant scholarships this year.

“We do not want anyone denied that opportunity because of finances,” Quinn said. “We can’t afford to lose all the talent that exists, all the ability that exists for higher education to help our economy and to help all of us, because there are financial challenges that deny someone the opportunity to go to community college or a four-year university — public and private — in our state.”

Quinn was joined by several Illinois college students, including DePaul Student Government Association Vice President Casey Clemmons.

“Every year over 5,000 DePaul students receive MAP grants, and just like the students who have already spoken here today, all of these DePaul students rely on this funding in order to continue their college careers,” Clemmons said.

“Because the number of Illinois students eligible to receive MAP is currently increasing, existing funding does not allow the state to assist all the eligible students. As a result, without action by the Illinois state leadership, more DePaul students than ever will see their MAP funding disappear this year and more

DePaul students than ever will be forced to give up their education due to finances.”

More than 150,000 students nationally receive MAP grants each year.

Clemmons told the audience that on Tuesday, DePaul’s SGA unanimously passed a resolution calling on the Illinois general assembly and the governor to ensure the longevity of the MAP program.  He read the resolution aloud and presented a copy to Quinn. 

Ken Thomas, a University of Illinois Board of Trustees student member, MAP recipient and University of Illinois Chicago student, told how he wouldn’t be where he is today if it wasn’t for the MAP grant.

“My mom, when I was in high school, had to work two jobs just to keep food on the table,” Thomas said, “and if we didn’t have [the] MAP program like we do today, I know that I wouldn’t be where I am today; graduating with a degree, hoping to be a productive member of society.” 

Having a productive and functioning society and economy is what Quinn says it’s all about.

“Jobs follow brainpower,” he said. “We want to make sure we have smart people in Illinois. Well skilled, well-educated students coming out of college with graduate degrees and diplomas so they can create jobs, create new businesses,” he said. “Our goal in Illinois is to have at least 60 percent of the adults in our state with a college degree or college associate degree or career certificate by the year 2025. In order to achieve we have to make sure we have a good scholarship program.”

Clemmons said that in order for that to happen, state legislatures need to reflect upon the question, “What must be done?” and do what’s required. 

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started